ericni 資深會員 ![資深會員 資深會員](modules/Forums/images/ranks/tent4.gif)
註冊時間: Jan 03, 2004 文章: 564
|
發表於: 星期四 2004-07-22 22:35
呵呵呵.........小弟上一篇剛貼出去的時候,
才猛然想到, 有個牌子已經大言不慚的自比做 "錶中的 Rolls Royce",
哎........說到這個牌子就覺得........
只能苦笑啦...
|
|
cmcmba 中級會員 ![中級會員 中級會員](modules/Forums/images/ranks/tent2.gif)
註冊時間: Jun 23, 2004 文章: 103
|
發表於: 星期四 2004-07-22 23:51
那若同樣的金額錶款 ,各位大哥會選則JLC或者GO呢?
|
|
fatsheep 中級會員 ![中級會員 中級會員](modules/Forums/images/ranks/tent2.gif)
註冊時間: Jun 24, 2004 文章: 152 來自: 天使之城
|
發表於: 星期四 2004-07-22 23:54
德製量產,不錯的機心(引擎),平實的外觀及水準的做工............
IMO, Audi? (generally better than VW but not as good as BMW or BENZ....)
|
|
flyback 歐美特派員 ![歐美特派員 歐美特派員](modules/Forums/images/ranks/xbox5.gif)
註冊時間: Nov 11, 2003 文章: 839
|
發表於: 星期五 2004-07-23 00:37
cmcmba 寫到: | 那若同樣的金額錶款 ,各位大哥會選則JLC或者GO呢? |
Depending on the model, but I personally would pick GO most of the time. I like display back and highly polished pieces. JLC just doesn't offer that enough. OTOH, I like the JLC alarm watches, which GO doesn't offer.
As for the Design, I like the GO design a little more.
Movement wise, I can't tell you, b/c I haven't taken anything apart. Based on reputation, I'd think they are about the same in terms of quality. But as for movements, you don't really have a lot of brands that really stand out. When you get to the high end, I think they are all very comparable.
|
|
cmcmba 中級會員 ![中級會員 中級會員](modules/Forums/images/ranks/tent2.gif)
註冊時間: Jun 23, 2004 文章: 103
|
發表於: 星期五 2004-07-23 00:48
flyback 寫到: | cmcmba 寫到: | 那若同樣的金額錶款 ,各位大哥會選則JLC或者GO呢? |
Depending on the model, but I personally would pick GO most of the time. I like display back and highly polished pieces. JLC just doesn't offer that enough. OTOH, I like the JLC alarm watches, which GO doesn't offer.
As for the Design, I like the GO design a little more.
Movement wise, I can't tell you, b/c I haven't taken anything apart. Based on reputation, I'd think they are about the same in terms of quality. But as for movements, you don't really have a lot of brands that really stand out. When you get to the high end, I think they are all very comparable. |
有大哥願意翻譯給小弟了解嘛??
我笨呀~~
阿明~~
|
|
as893 中級會員 ![中級會員 中級會員](modules/Forums/images/ranks/tent2.gif)
註冊時間: May 08, 2003 文章: 121
|
發表於: 星期五 2004-07-23 02:10
Depending on the model, but I personally would pick GO most of the time. I like display back and highly polished pieces. JLC just doesn't offer that enough. OTOH, I like the JLC alarm watches, which GO doesn't offer.
那要看是什麼款式,我個人比較喜歡GO. 因為JLC沒有GO的透明錶背和精細打磨.... 但我喜歡JLC的鬧鈴錶因為GO沒這種錶款.
As for the Design, I like the GO design a little more.
我比較喜歡GO的設計.
Movement wise, I can't tell you, b/c I haven't taken anything apart. Based on reputation, I'd think they are about the same in terms of quality. But as for movements, you don't really have a lot of brands that really stand out. When you get to the high end, I think they are all very comparable.
機心方面, 我無法回答因為我從未拆過它們. 就它們的品牌形象, 我不覺得它們是同等級的.... 沒有很多廠的機心是特別凸出的. 高檔機心品質都很相似的.
翻譯真難
|
|
ericni 資深會員 ![資深會員 資深會員](modules/Forums/images/ranks/tent4.gif)
註冊時間: Jan 03, 2004 文章: 564
|
發表於: 星期五 2004-07-23 02:28
那要看型號, 但我個人大多會選 GO. 我較喜歡具有透明錶背與拋光的款式, 這點 JLC 比較無法提供. 另一方面, 我喜歡 JLC 的鬧鈴錶, 這 GO 就無法提供.
至於設計, 我喜歡 GO 多一點.
機芯我就無法告知了, 因為我尚未拆解過. 不過基於兩品牌之名聲, 我想她們的品質方面大約相同. 但至於機芯方面, 其實你沒辦法真正挑出一堆牌子堪稱鶴立雞群的, 因為當你到達 High end 階段時, 我想她們都算是能夠平起平坐的.
( 急急忙忙翻過, 與原意若有出入, 請多多指正! 謝謝! )
|
|
flyback 歐美特派員 ![歐美特派員 歐美特派員](modules/Forums/images/ranks/xbox5.gif)
註冊時間: Nov 11, 2003 文章: 839
|
發表於: 星期五 2004-07-23 05:12
ericni & as893,
Thanks for translating.. 小弟非常佩服... I can't write better than that even if I can type Chinese.
as893兄, I think there's a typo. Just to clarify, I do think 它們是同等級的.
|
|
cmcmba 中級會員 ![中級會員 中級會員](modules/Forums/images/ranks/tent2.gif)
註冊時間: Jun 23, 2004 文章: 103
|
發表於: 星期五 2004-07-23 13:14
感謝ericni兄與as893兄的翻譯...小弟銘謝在心~~
flyback兄的看法很正確~~
每一家錶廠都有拿手的看家本領 , 只要是自製機心...都是好錶~~
|
|
flyback 歐美特派員 ![歐美特派員 歐美特派員](modules/Forums/images/ranks/xbox5.gif)
註冊時間: Nov 11, 2003 文章: 839
|
發表於: 星期五 2004-07-23 23:38
cmcmba 寫到: | 只要是自製機心...都是好錶~~ |
Please don't forget about those are not 自製機心. Some watches doesn't have 自製機心, but they are still 好錶.
|
|
|
|