| 發表人 | 內容 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
小藍
資深會員   |
發表於: 星期一 2004-08-02 12:48
....人生有許多事很難說.....
不過戴手錶真的要看場合 我認為 去和一群對手錶有涉獵的朋友聚餐 戴個駝飛輪或是三問表 去聽古典音樂會 可帶PP紳士表 上酒家 賭場 超級金勞滿天星 和小孩去天文台郊遊 可帶萬年曆 日月星辰 替老婆去參加母姐會 超大表款SWATCH 去故宮博物館 18K金懷表 去釣魚 CASIO釣魚潮汐表 去登山 天梭蘿拉表(古墓奇兵表) 去光華商場買電腦產品 CASIO計算機表 去光華商場買AV 春宮表 
去龍潭賽車 迪通拿 去清泉崗看飛機展 百年靈 去國外出差 雙地時間 去PUB搖頭 冷光表 警察抓小偷 柯南麻醉表 說真的....別怪別人說你俗 戴表真的要看場合 我更慘.......我朋友只認得勞力士 SEIKO CK 其他OMEGA TISSOT SINN IWC...........皆不認得 帶了也等於白戴 
|
||
|
Etacaa
中級會員   |
發表於: 星期一 2004-08-02 13:27
"上酒家 賭場 超級金勞滿天星" ????
This is the problem. Why ROLEX for "上酒家 賭場"? That's a pity. Let me ask a few questions: (1) Which brand reached the top of Himalayas first? (2) Which brand reached 10,000M deep down in the ocean first? (3) Which brand reached the Antarctic and North Pole first? (4) Which brand can be hit by a truck and still pass COSC? (5) Which brand created 24hour for two time zones? (6) Which brand invented the date window? (7) Which brand sponsored the most scientific researches and sport events? (8) Which brand donated the most to charity? Answers: ROLEX Don't get me wrong. I love PP, Lange, etc. But, "上酒家 賭場 超級金勞滿天星" doesn't do any justice to ROLEX. ROLEX is the fundation for almost all modern watches. I admire ROLEX not only for watch making but also for running a successful business. ROLEX is a victim of its own success. Many people want others to think they are rich and powerful. When they get rich, the first purchase is a ROLEX. Well, many people end up buying fake ROLEX. Pity!! I wonder if PP is following the same path in Taiwan. |
||
|
cmcmba
中級會員  |
發表於: 星期一 2004-08-02 14:55
勞力士的歷史要改成以下
1.黑道大哥的愛錶. 2.當舖最愛的錶. 3.土財主炫耀的錶. 4.沒錢.跑路最愛的錶. 真是成敗一念間阿~~ _________________ 阿明~~ |
||
|
小藍
資深會員 |
發表於: 星期一 2004-08-02 16:02
回Etacaa
上酒家賭場為何戴勞力士???? 因為 1. 酒家....性服務者認識的手錶品牌不多 看到勞力士自然會來奉承巴結.... 2. 賭場 ...當你賭輸錢的時候勞力士可用來當場抵押換現金...有人看過用OMEGA抵押的嗎? 這些場所的人最愛勞力士 實不相瞞 我其實很喜歡勞力士 醫生錶 迪通拿 泡泡背 探險家 潛水錶.... 勞力士成功的塑造了王者的形象 ......成功者都應該擁有一只勞力士 體壇名將 音樂家 探險家 都幫勞力士廣告 黑道大哥也是大哥 
企業金主也是金主 這些人也不是泛泛之輩啊 我覺得這也沒什麼不好 對平凡的人而言也比較簡單 反正勞力士就是好 但是對玩錶的來說 勞力士為什麼好反而比較重要 機心型號 性能 勞力士歷史....都要略知一二 所謂 內行看門道 外行湊熱鬧 |
||
|
ppyc
資深會員 |
|||
|
swaylone
中級會員 |
發表於: 星期一 2004-08-02 20:59
數量很多很普遍就一定會變"俗"?究竟是這一個東西讓某人變俗,還是因為某人的俗糟蹋這
一個東西?不管是Rolex或是ETA,認為它們俗的人,究其原罪竟是數量太多,因為世界上有太 多人需要它們,而這個世界上甚麼樣的人都有!! (說ETA俗,ETA哀怨地說:被裝進"老死蛋鈍"裏,人家也是千百個不願意呀.把我捧得 那麼高,我還怕摔死哩!) |
||
|
ericni
資深會員  |
發表於: 星期一 2004-08-02 21:39
不知大家是否容易在乎別人眼光? 小弟我個人不會太在意!
我會戴 Rolex, 是因為我很清楚我戴它的理由, 別人若講些無關緊要的話, 我通常一笑置之, 不過, 佩帶 Rolex 的確是有個壞處: 當看到別人跟你帶同樣的錶款時, 並沒有 "英雄所見略同" 的感覺..... 
只因為......有錢後就買支 Rolex 來戴的人, 真的好多...... |
||
|
ldavid
進階會員   |
發表於: 星期一 2004-08-02 22:10
我覺得用不同的角度來看rolex..
之前沒擁有過..真的覺得很俗] 等買到,來校對時間,發現那麼準...就覺得她好在那裡 也許有很多更好的...但目前擁有最好的就是rolex... |
||
|
Etacaa
中級會員 |
發表於: 星期二 2004-08-03 01:38
"勞力士的歷史要改成以下
1.黑道大哥的愛錶. 2.當舖最愛的錶. 3.土財主炫耀的錶. 4.沒錢.跑路最愛的錶. " Man, I give up. Taiwan ruined the images of many wonderful things: ROLEX, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, French liquor, French wine, etc. When James Bond wore ROLEX in many of the Bond movies, people thought that it was very classic. When a Taiwanese wears a ROLEX, people think that he is a "土財主" or "黑道大哥". It is a good thing that Taiwan doesn't have many places to race cars. Otherwise, Ferrari, Porsche, and Lamborghini would become "bad names" too. "真是成敗一念間阿~~" Who failed? ROLEX or Taiwan? |
||
|
flyback
歐美特派員   |
發表於: 星期二 2004-08-03 03:08
Etacaa兄,
I don't think it's just Taiwan. A lot people don't care to find out what they are buying, using, or wearing. Reputation and acceptance plays a big part in our daily life, b/c we get a stonger sense of security out of it. The classic example is, when others think a product is good, then it can't go wrong; and when everyone thinks it's bad, one should stay away. It's purely psychological, b/c most people don't want to be the Guinea Pig. That's why celebrity endorsement is useful. I personally feel that there's a stronger trait in Asian cultures than the Western cultures, b/c we care a lot more about what other people think. A lot of people just want to "fit in" or be recognized and don't want to be too different from the norm. In this sense, I think the US offers more room to be "different", b/c it's diversified to start out with (they have to worry about the population being too diversified). On the other hand, I personally feel that HK and Taiwan don't offer as much room. This is neither good nor bad. It's just part of the culture. So what does this have to do with Rolex (or even PP)? Each brand has an image, and that's where the value lies in marketing sense. Rolex has been succesful in selling its products, and whether you know or not know the watches, this is what you get when you buy the watch. Most people happened to get the watch based on this image, or reputation, and not for the red wheels or its actual history. I doubt Rolex wants to make it 俗, but it can't be avoided, and it's a mutual acceptance on both ends. Swaylone brought up a good point that the number of products in the market has a lot to do with it. Out of all posts here, I echo wy02 and swaylone's thoughts.
To be honest, I used to think somewhat lowly of this brand prior to coming on board here. The major reason is, I'm a big fan of complications, and it doesn't really offer any, yet it's trying to brush a leading image among others. However, after arguing and studying the brand, I realize, this is exactly what they are trying to do. And in fact, they can execute their plan much better than other companies. So, even I still don't prefer the technical part, I have much more respect to it as a business entity. They have a plan, and they got it done. Anyway, I think this is an interesting thread, and I just want to chip in my thoughts. |
||
