http://www.network54.com/Forum/thread?forumid=211346&messageid=1101470757
其實最讓我驚奇的是Double Split用上了不一樣的擺輪
![耍酷](modules/Forums/images/smiles/icon__msn06.gif)
發表人 | 內容 | ||
---|---|---|---|
calatravayang
榮譽版面管理員 ![]() ![]() |
轉貼自The Purists Jaw的文章
http://www.network54.com/Forum/thread?forumid=211346&messageid=1101470757 其實最讓我驚奇的是Double Split用上了不一樣的擺輪 ![]() |
||
PATRICK
終極會員 ![]() ![]() |
好!
期待擁有的表友將它貼出來 分享一下 _________________ 請您支持 本站莫拉克水災捐款活動 http://www.watchbus.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=604737#604737 |
||
alanyyh
進階會員 ![]() ![]() |
|||
calatravayang
榮譽版面管理員 ![]() ![]() |
|||
keigen
白金會員 ![]() ![]() |
|||
olddog
新進會員 ![]() ![]() |
I don't think it is a wristwatch but more like a pocket watch. It is huge and complicated. Yesterday I saw it and feel really stunning about the craft . It is not elegant at all. I admit it is a beautiful mechanical design but faraway from aesthetic. We enjoy good wrist watch more about the delight elements not mechanical.
![]() |
||
alanyyh
進階會員 ![]() ![]() |
|||
olddog
新進會員 ![]() ![]() |
Don't read me wrong. The movement is really a piece of genius work. It is a new approach to accomplish the complicated multifunctions with miniacture mechanical. It was well designed and manufactured and deserved to be respected by the breakthroughs.
But with the attempt to realize the complicated functions, so the unrealistic size seems inevitable. What I can not image is who will feel easy to wear this except Anorald Schwarzenegger. So my point is the wrist watch should face it's nature constraint-- the size. The movement is good but what make people feel good is not mechanical "only". ![]() |
||
jules
資深會員 ![]() ![]() |
十分同意您的觀點,機械並不是只有一種欣賞觀點,複雜也可能造成反效果。 |
||
PATRICK
終極會員 ![]() ![]() |
![]() 我還是喜歡舊款 AB AUF有紅色指示的 _________________ 請您支持 本站莫拉克水災捐款活動 http://www.watchbus.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=604737#604737 |
||