| 發表人 | 內容 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
spikegifted
進階會員   |
發表於: 星期六 2007-01-27 21:53
You're correct that IWC was started by an American. However, he knew there were few places were there was the skill based to support his venture - southern Germany or Switzerland. He chose Switzerland. I'm not entirely certain about the 'accuracy' of the survey either. You can get people to say whatever you want depending on how the questions are asked. Personally, I'd take a large dose of skepticism to anything like that. 
|
||
|
TOMTOM
終極會員   |
發表於: 星期六 2007-01-27 22:15
幾十萬的錶送原廠是沒有道理的.....
"原廠在地保修"是小弟給IWC的建議..... 如果真的在意台灣市場的話~ _________________ 如果說 Patek Philippe 是貴族的十字徽章，那麼 Rolex 就像是凡人的王者標記 |
||
|
IWC_371438
資深會員   |
發表於: 星期日 2007-01-28 11:09
我也贊成 原廠在地保修 的概念 但是IWC不是只有10十幾萬的錶 20萬到百萬間的錶比比皆是 複雜功能表一堆 除非原廠技師來台佇廠 否則我還是不放心台灣的技師 有實不是技術問題 而是良心問題 台灣人太聰明 投機性太強 言盡與此 _________________ 獨登高處亦蕭然 偉哉挺立勁風中 |
||
|
BarryHo
白金會員   |
發表於: 星期日 2007-01-28 11:27
個人以為將maintain service做一,二線之區分,
三針/計時等非很複雜的機芯,在地的一線服務中心即可處理, 而複雜機芯則後送回二線--原廠! _________________ 以錶會友,以友會錶! |
||
|
950
初級會員   |
|||
