![](http://www.watchbus.com/modules/coppermine/albums/userpics/13644/JLC_T04.jpg)
實體看起來真的不錯!
發表人 | 內容 | |
---|---|---|
lkapia
中級會員 ![]() ![]() |
||
|
||
givenhua
違例停權 ![]() |
||
givenhua
違例停權 ![]() |
||
givenhua
違例停權 ![]() |
||
tony510
中級會員 ![]() ![]() |
||
|
||
keigen
白金會員 ![]() ![]() |
||
Etacaa
中級會員 ![]() ![]() |
I have a "inappropriate" question here:
TOURBILLON was invented to fight the gravity so that the watch could be accurate. I really wonder how accurate a Tourbillion watch can be today. I know that many people think the accuracy is no longer important and it is all about arts. But, if a design is created to make the watch more accurate, should it really serve the function? |
|
Etacaa
中級會員 ![]() ![]() |
Well, I just did some searches on the TimeZone and found the answer to my question above:
Today, Tourbillion is indeed an art and doesn't outperform other well-designed "simple" watches. In fact, sometimes, the complication of Tourbillion movements makes a watch less accurate. Well, it becomes very personal if the art is worth that much of money. |
|
cckwok
新進會員 ![]() ![]() |
||