submariner3135 寫到: |
---|
門面是弄得不錯,
可是, 看那小鳥輪機芯, 還是覺得十足的土砲樣.......... |
不知道那小鳥輪是否會飛跑掉.....
![非常高興](modules/Forums/images/smiles/icon__msn02.gif)
發表人 | 內容 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ben9125
新進會員 ![]() ![]() |
|||||
BP133
中級會員 ![]() |
|||||
jdm_z33
白金會員 ![]() ![]() |
|||||
mdoohan74
初級會員 ![]() ![]() |
|||||
nakasaki
資深會員 ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Aburastar
中級會員 ![]() ![]() |
Put aside the China / Taiwan topic many people talks days and night - I think Seagull is no longer merely a small and sub-average local watch maker many people referred here...
True, its craftsmanship is still far behind those insanely pricy swiss firms. Yet it shows significant improvements it has been made recently. I bought a so-called "bird tourbillon" from ebay a couple years back... the rose gold plating, blue hands, and dial are all still intact and shine as new. And amazingly, it keeps very accurate time!! Look at what they are cooking here : http://forums.watchuseek.com/showthread.php?t=27166 Seriously, I don't feel confident to criticize it anymore. _________________ Live is short, savor every minute - in style. |
||||
Dez0403
中級會員 ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Ethan
進階會員 ![]() ![]() |
|||||
submariner3135
終極會員 ![]() ![]() |
How accurate ?? I am really curious too...... ![]() |
||||
Aburastar
中級會員 ![]() ![]() |
1. The turbillon pointer serves as the second hand and it can't be stopped when setting time. So I'd use the scope of accuracy in "+/- min in a week (7 days)" 2. There is no power resrve so I wind it every morning. 3. It goes faster but less then 1 min for the whole 7 days testing. I had conducted several such 7-day cycle test... it always less the 1min faster. --- if you average them, it yields 8.57 sec per day. It's pretty close to my Longine Master moon (+6~7/day) and beats my Seiko automatic diver that has +2min per week. Though my Hamilton GMT Air is way better at -3/day. _________________ Live is short, savor every minute - in style. |
||||