fred 寫到: |
---|
很好看而且價格很合理只是小弟覺得應該是大陸代工的手錶 |
我亦有相同的想法因Stowa買的是兩倍價錢但就是在德國造如這錶亦是德國做的就不合價格定位因那裡人工高所以在大陸做可能性高Steinhart只負責品管。
以這樣的價錢買德國品管還是值得啦。....
發表人 | 內容 | ||
---|---|---|---|
chiewata
資深會員 |
|||
yenfoolun
進階會員 |
|||
chd_michael
中級會員 |
|||
Chiardy
進階會員 |
http://www.steinhartwatches.de/index.php?id=67&artnr=120&Sel_ID=18#120 http://www.steinhartwatches.de/index.php?id=67&artnr=16&Sel_ID=18#16 這兩支是自動的。 _________________ There´s something one should expect not only of a watch, but also of oneself: Never stand still. |
||
chiewata
資深會員 |
|||
chiewata
資深會員 |
|||
yenfoolun
進階會員 |
|||
jdm_z33
白金會員 |
這真的是...太毒啦, 照片看起來不錯...讓我產生了高度的興趣.
剛剛上網research了一下, 發現國外對這個品牌的意見很多喔...想買的可以參考看看: Wrist Watch Review 討論Steinhart 基本上, 回應好壞都有. 在外觀設計, 穩定性上面的爭論特別的嚴重. 基本上是討論以下幾點: 1.) Steinhart外觀設計幾乎仿冒知名品牌設計. 2.) Steinhart標榜是在瑞士的JURA山區製作, 不過價錢卻超便宜? 3.) Steinhart的穩定性, 有使用者表示已經跟原廠換過一些零件? 小弟本有衝動差點馬上購買, 不過看了這些討論之後, 會想要在了解這家公司更深一點才下手. 他的飛行錶設計跟Stowa的沒兩樣, 說實在的, 唯一我會想買的特點是便宜, 類IWC大錶冠和有手上鍊Unitas機芯. 可能有機會看到實錶才會比較準. 不過我覺得如果一家公司的設計都跟大品牌列同, 那購買這家公司產品錢我會考慮久一點. 給各位有衝動購買的巴友參考一下嘞...請指教 jdm_z33 在 星期三 2008-07-30 17:19 作了第 3 次修改 |
||
pokuan77
資深會員 |
|||
jdm_z33
白金會員 |
以下為美國的某錶友的發言:
First point – the watches are made in China with Swiss movement and assembled, most probably, in Switzerland (hence they can be called Swiss made). This way of conducting business is carried out by many brands but at least Steinhart does not rip off customers like Ball watches, for example. Grovana have supplied a number of their models to Steinhart under the Steinhart name. As one design is a copy of a Bell & Ross model, Grovana tried it first with Steinhart in USA before launching it (in case of B&R suing them). The Steinhart Mach 1 – is absolutely great value for money. Which other make can offer a Swiss movement (Dubois Dépraz 2020 - = ETA 2894 - Chronograph Tricompax = ETA 2892 base movement + ETA Tricompax chronograph module) automatic chronograph for below 625 Euros? Sapphire crystal and water resistant. Latest models on line are moving away from Grovana design (and probably Grovana very poor quality standards). I know Steinhart USA had to change name and this may reflect some new policies. I reckon Steinhart is one of the very few brands where value for money really means something. |
||