hsiehhsiuchi 中級會員
註冊時間: Apr 12, 2004 文章: 170
|
發表於: 星期三 2004-10-13 22:45
danielc 寫到: | i'm pretty sure 勞力士durability高VC一等. |
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈
那就恭喜你找到你喜歡的錶囉
希望你好好享受高人一等的感覺吧
|
|
danielc 初級會員
註冊時間: Oct 09, 2004 文章: 46
|
發表於: 星期四 2004-10-14 00:57
pls dun get me wrong, i never think ROLEX is 高人一等! thats silly....
but its true that i found myself a nice watch that i really appreciate, its an answer to what i'm after.
maybe theres something u just dun understand, ROLEX is a good allrounder that many others just can't compare.........like VC......
by the way, hope u can be careful w/ ur VC, dun take it for dive or so............
|
|
roleks 初級會員
註冊時間: Oct 13, 2004 文章: 29
|
發表於: 星期四 2004-10-14 01:24
是很聳...但是...每個人都認識它
|
|
albert weng 初級會員
註冊時間: Sep 15, 2004 文章: 52 來自: Taiwan Taipei
|
發表於: 星期五 2004-10-15 00:18
flyback 寫到: | Etacaa,
I haven't heard people mentioning Michael Porter for a long time. Have you talked to him personally?
I used to compare watches to automobiles. However, I've come to realize it doesn't always work that way. The automobile industry is a total different animal. Also, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. So when you think of it as a G class, some people may look at it with lessor respect. I personally feel that we should stay away from that comparison.
One way or the other, Rolex did a great job in its market positioning, and they can just ride on it. From a business point of view, I think they are admirable. I simply admire the founder's wisdom--from finding its own market segment to simply just picking the right name. He did pretty much everything right, everything a b-school professor can dream of. And that was around 80 years ago.
As a collector, however, I'm afraid it doesn't fit into my own philosophy. It is no doubt very accurate and durable. It sure holds a great resale value. It's certainly easier to repair and to service. And it's recognizable. However, I am a very strange man and it doesn't really interest me. What can I do?
Anyway, I'm sure I represent the minority here, but it's sure interesting to know what everyone else thinks.
my 2 cents. |
Flyback,
After read your post and Etcca's word by word, I feel like I should go back to college and re-take Marketing 120 again. oh man I hate marketing!!! But I agree with your point.
|
|
flyback 歐美特派員
註冊時間: Nov 11, 2003 文章: 839
|
發表於: 星期五 2004-10-15 01:39
danielc, hsiehhsiuchi was talking about 勞斯單頓 (Rosdenton).. not 江詩丹頓 (VC)...... BIG.. no, HUGE difference. just teasing.....
thanks albert weng.... I'm definitely the minority here.
|
|
win95 中級會員
註冊時間: Jun 29, 2004 文章: 110
|
發表於: 星期五 2004-10-15 10:14
江詩丹頓 不是 勞斯丹頓
但是江詩丹頓已經被勞斯丹頓稀釋啦
為何江詩丹頓不主張商標淡化呢?
|
|
calatravayang 榮譽版面管理員
註冊時間: Jun 14, 2004 文章: 4073 來自: 台北
|
發表於: 星期五 2004-10-15 11:06
win95 寫到: | 江詩丹頓 不是 勞斯丹頓
但是江詩丹頓已經被勞斯丹頓稀釋啦
為何江詩丹頓不主張商標淡化呢? |
VC跟勞斯丹頓的顧客群幾乎可以說完全沒交集
名字取再怎麼像也不會去影響到VC啊
|
|
THOMMEN 新進會員
註冊時間: Oct 25, 2004 文章: 17
|
發表於: 星期三 2004-10-27 03:23
表示無辜ㄉ~
|
|
danielc 初級會員
註冊時間: Oct 09, 2004 文章: 46
|
發表於: 星期三 2004-10-27 11:46
never heard of 勞斯單頓 (Rosdenton)...
|
|
ya00 中級會員
註冊時間: Oct 20, 2004 文章: 130
|
發表於: 星期四 2004-10-28 11:31
忙完了14小時x6天之後
我喜歡在星期天,
戴上勞力士
坐上賓士
開在人車稀少, 視野遼闊的路上閒逛,
不是偷得浮生半日閒
別在乎"俗""雅"
一切都是辛苦的代價
只為嘗味人生
|
|
|
|