Blithe 寫到: | ||
---|---|---|
不見得喔. 請先看看 John B. Holbrook, II 所寫的評論. |
抱歉...
我只是以機芯
粗分等級
這在我買大海馬前我已拜讀
的確是偏好文
_________________
曾經滄海難為水,除卻巫山不是雲
發表人 | 內容 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hau
終極會員 |
|||||||
Blithe
終極會員 |
不過,以目前 Omega 的價位而言,若要小弟選擇,小弟會直接買 Rolex Submariner 或 Rolex Sea-Dweller. _________________ 「家貧出孝子,困境造賢人.」 「把手指放在善惡交界之處,就可以碰觸上帝的袍服。」 |
||||||
spikegifted
進階會員 |
Nice little comparison... While it is difficult to avoid being subjective, the writer managed to remain fair throughout. While I cannot fault his analysis, one thing I notice he did not do was to weigh the relative importance of each of the category, e.g. some people (read: real divers) think the dial markers & hands and clasp are more important, while others (read: collectors) think movement and prestige are more important... It's all subjective at the end of the day. |
||||||